FierceCIOFierceCIOTechWatchFierceMobileITFierceContentManagementFierceGovernmentIT   FierceComplianceITFierceHealthITFierceFinanceIT

New features in Office 2010 nothing to write home about

Tools
Tags
Paul Thurotte
Office 2010
Microsoft Office
Microsoft

Paul Thurotte reports this week, in the always excellent Windows Supersite blog, on some new features in Office 2010. Looking down the list it's nothing dazzling, beyond its integration in the cloud, which should improve its collaboration capabilities. Of course, since many corporations use Office in conjunction with SharePoint, they get the collaboration features as part of the package.

The online component could be most useful for smaller businesses that don't want to invest in SharePoint, but still want to share documents in a collaborative environment. Still, other features listed, such as a screen capture tool, author permissions and a revamped Office button are probably not going to make people run out and buy the upgrade.

The truth is, Office has reached a maturity level where it's hard for a company to continue to add value in such a way that it can justify the upgrade costs. But, as Sheri McCleish points out on the Forrester Blog for Information and Knowledge Management Professionals, Microsoft has a commanding lead in the office productivity suite market, leaving competitors just a blip on the radar.

If companies are evaluating ways to cut costs, reducing the number of Microsoft Office licenses makes a lot of sense. Free or low-cost tools like OpenOffice and Google Docs provide a sufficient level of functionality that will be suitable for most employee's needs. Companies can still keep licenses for those employees who need the advanced tools in Excel for example, but cut back on the overall number of licenses in the future.

In a time when people are looking to cut costs, this would seem to be a reasonable approach. Most companies won't be willing to give up Microsoft Office, but if they can reduce their overall costs, it only makes sense to explore lower cost or free alternatives.

For more information:
- see the post on the Windows Supersite blog
- and the post on the Forrester blog

Related Articles:
OpenOffice 3.1 comes with better performance
Google outage makes some rethink cloud services
Microsoft Groove to get a new name in Office 2010
Can Microsoft dominate web-based applications?

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceContentManagement Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

Nothing beneficial for most businesses - no reason to upgrade/purchase -

Like Vista - all bling - no function.

If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.

2. Full OLE support for pictures in access - umm wasn't that functional with Office XP - why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?

3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don't want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I'm one person and most of my clients don't like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.