HOT TOPICS >> Q2 Earnings Roundup | CMIS | Mergers and Acquisitions | Industry Voices | One on One Interviews
IT NEWS BY INDUSTRY >> Healthcare IT | Government IT | Financial Services IT | Biotech IT | Compliance IT
Could SharePoint simply be 'good enough?'
Comments
By Eric Barroca | Posted 7:26pm | June 16, 2009
The omnipresence of Sharepoint in organisation is obvious and should be recognized. It's a pretty good
replacement of the shared drives that were around and usually have been replaced by SP. And this is what
SP is good at: shared drives on steroids with some sugar for basic collaboration and document
management. If you just need this and already rely a lot on Microsoft infrastructure, Sharepoint is
probably a good choice.
The real question comes when you need more than replacing your shared drive: when you want to build and
deeply integrate your content within your business processes or when you want to build applications in
the field of ECM. For that you need a flexible and extensible ECM platform on which you can build.
SharePoint is not well known for its extensibility and flexibility when it comes to building on top of
it.
So clearly SharePoint is good enough for many basic use cases, the main one being replacing shared
drives. But when you're there, you're not solving the common proliferation problem. But as a development
and integration platform, to deeply integrate your content into your business processes (or to build
so-called CEVAs), I think it still has a long way to go, and doesn't seem a platform developer favors.
And I don't think the big guys (EMC, IBM and Oracle) are really answering properly to this.
In short: is you're looking at just replacing your shared drives, it's definitely a great option and
will give you better features than what you had. Of course, I may be bias, being CEO of the open source
player Nuxeo.
Cheers,
EB.
By rmiller | Posted 7:18am | June 17, 2009
Hey Eric:
Your point is well taken, all bias aside. SharePoint does some things well (or at least well enough) and that's one of the reasons it's so popular, but you are correct that it doesn't appear to go deeply into solving content management issues below the surface. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Ron







