FierceCIOFierceCIOTechWatchFierceMobileITFierceContentManagementFierceGovernmentIT   FierceComplianceITFierceHealthITFierceFinanceIT

Could SharePoint simply be 'good enough?'

At the EMC Writer's Conference last Friday in New York City, Bryant Duhon, an editor at AIIM's Infonomics magazine gave a presentation on Microsoft SharePoint. Many participants engaged in a lively discussion, which concluded that while SharePoint wasn't the best solution out there, "it is good enough" for most organizations' requirements.

Duhon pointed out that it may be a good choice for many IT departments because it's cheap and often free. It is also familiar because it is a Microsoft product, even if it's not the best technology available. Whitney Tidmarsh, CMO for the Content Management and Archiving Division at EMC, pointed out that SharePoint was never going to be a complete ECM solution, but it brings ECM to the desktop level. She sees value in that, because it puts the idea of content management in front of end users.

The fact that it's fairly easy for end users to understand and deploy is a strength on one hand, but it can also result in literally thousands of SharePoint sites across the enterprise, raising a huge, governance red flag.

At the conference, Annette Weller-Collison, a senior consultant at Kahn Consulting, a firm that advises companies on risk and compliance issues, pointed out that these sites are spread out all over the place and companies have no idea what they have. If such a company were issued an eDiscovery request, it would have no idea how many sites it had or what content could be lurking inside them. She says companies need to start paying attention because there are huge compliance and findability issues around maintaining so many sites.

SharePoint is impossible for companies like EMC to ignore (as I wrote in SharePoint's hard to define, but you can't ignore Microsoft as an ECM Player). Their presence across the enterprise is undeniable, but the question remains whether SharePoint provides a complete ECM solution or one that is simply "good enough" for most operations. Either way, Microsoft is clearly winning the numbers game.

Related Articles:
SharePoint's hard to define, but you can't ignore Microsoft as an ECM player
Lars Fastrup gets a brief look at SharePoint 2010
Beta of SharePoint Server 2010 coming soon
Survey finds that SharePoint remains a file share for almost half of users

SHARE WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceContentManagement Email Newsletter:
Comments (2) | Post a comment

Comments

The omnipresence of Sharepoint in organisation is obvious and should be recognized. It's a pretty good replacement of the shared drives that were around and usually have been replaced by SP. And this is what SP is good at: shared drives on steroids with some sugar for basic collaboration and document management. If you just need this and already rely a lot on Microsoft infrastructure, Sharepoint is probably a good choice. The real question comes when you need more than replacing your shared drive: when you want to build and deeply integrate your content within your business processes or when you want to build applications in the field of ECM. For that you need a flexible and extensible ECM platform on which you can build. SharePoint is not well known for its extensibility and flexibility when it comes to building on top of it. So clearly SharePoint is good enough for many basic use cases, the main one being replacing shared drives. But when you're there, you're not solving the common proliferation problem. But as a development and integration platform, to deeply integrate your content into your business processes (or to build so-called CEVAs), I think it still has a long way to go, and doesn't seem a platform developer favors. And I don't think the big guys (EMC, IBM and Oracle) are really answering properly to this. In short: is you're looking at just replacing your shared drives, it's definitely a great option and will give you better features than what you had. Of course, I may be bias, being CEO of the open source player Nuxeo. Cheers, EB.

Hey Eric:
Your point is well taken, all bias aside. SharePoint does some things well (or at least well enough) and that's one of the reasons it's so popular, but you are correct that it doesn't appear to go deeply into solving content management issues below the surface. Thanks for taking the time to comment.

Ron

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.