FierceCIOFierceCIOTechWatchFierceMobileITFierceContentManagementFierceGovernmentIT   FierceComplianceITFierceHealthITFierceFinanceIT

Could micro payments save the news business?

Tools
Tags
Wall Street Journal
Rupert Murdoch
online content
newspapers
Newscorp
micro payments

When you place content on the web, you are doing it for some purpose:

  • You may want to show your expertise.
  • You may want to drive traffic to sell ads.
  • You may want to sell a product or service.

Whatever your reason, your ultimate purpose is to drive some business agenda, for the news business that purpose has grown unclear in the last few years. Most news organizations have been late to the game on the Internet (as I wrote in News Business Declined Due to Lack of Vision) or have failed to understand how to operate online (as I wrote in Mayer Says Google Not Responsible for Newspapers' Decline), but one thing is for sure, newspapers have to figure out how to make money online and one way to do that is with micro-payments.

Micro-payments are small one-time payments for a given piece of content. Newscorp wants to try this model with Wall Street Journal content. It really depends how much they would charge for these one-time payments. If they kept them cheap using the iTunes model, they could be successful, assuming the content is good enough, you can't find similar content for free elsewhere and people are willing to pony up for good content.

It's not clear yet how these models will work, but perhaps people could be willing to pay for premium content, something over and above the standard fare they get everywhere else. It remains to be seen if a public raised on free content will be willing to make that change, but I would say, it offers publications an alternative revenue source. If they do it right, it might not rescue the news business, but it could certainly help them.

Related Articles:
Time for the news business to get its head out of the 20th Century
Nstein lands deal with major newspaper publisher
WSJ editor: Google is an Internet parasite

Twitter   Facebook   LinkedIn   StumbleUpon  
Get Your FREE FierceContentManagement Email Newsletter:
Comments (2) | Post a comment

Comments

ITunes notwithstanding, I'm highly skeptical of micropayments. The literature on human decision making generally shows that we don't like repeatedly incurring small costs, as compared to making a single decision to spend a lot of money. That's why amusement parks offer pay-on-price admission, or why we'll buy a car rather than repeatedly use taxis or car rentals.

But I suppose every advocate of micropayments thinks they can extrapolate from iTunes. :-)

Hi Daniel:
The answer depends on a lot of factors I outlined here. Is the content worth paying for? On iTunes it certainly is for a number of reasons including the fact it makes it easier to get onto the iPod and the content is desirable. If a device like the Kindle takes off, and I think it will eventually (especially if Apple gets in the game) we will begin see subscription (one time payment model you allude to), and micro payment content for one-off stuff like buying a magazine at the newsstand. I don't think it's a panacea, but I do think it can provide an income stream.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.